Post Market Surveillance (PMS) Consulting

Regulatory compliance doesn’t end at market entry, ongoing monitoring is essential. We develop and implement robust Post Market Surveillance (PMS) strategies ta...

Post-Market Surveillance (PMS) Consulting for MDR and IVDR

Independent Post-Market Surveillance Consultants

MDRcert designs and remediates post-market surveillance systems for medical device and IVD manufacturers. PMS is where certified companies most often fall out of compliance, because the obligations start on the day the certificate is issued and nobody is chasing a deadline any more.

The requirements are explicit. Article 83 requires a PMS system proportionate to risk class, Article 84 requires a PMS plan meeting Annex III, Article 85 sets the PMS report for Class I, and Article 86 sets the PSUR for Class IIa and above. Under IVDR the same architecture sits in Articles 78 to 81.

A PMS plan is not a policy document. Annex III requires stated indicators, thresholds and methods, which means someone has to decide in advance what number counts as a signal.

Reports Built From Data You Actually Collect

The commonest audit finding is a PSUR whose conclusions are unsupported because the data behind them was never systematically gathered. A report that says no trends were identified, from a system with no defined thresholds, tells a reviewer nothing.

PSUR frequency is fixed by class: at least every two years for Class IIa, annually for Class IIb and Class III. For implantable and Class III devices the PSUR goes to the Notified Body through EUDAMED rather than sitting in your file. Missing that is a compliance failure, not an administrative slip.

We set up the collection first and the reporting second: complaint intake, trend thresholds, the Article 88 trend reporting trigger for statistically significant increases in non-serious incidents, and the vigilance route under Articles 87 to 92 for serious incidents and field safety corrective actions.

Our PMS Consulting Process

Structured post-market surveillance from baseline to sustained compliance

Assess

Current-State PMS Gap Assessment

Plan

PMS Plan, Indicators and Threshold Design

Build

Data Collection, Trending and Signal Workflow

Submit

PMS Report and PSUR Authoring

Maintain

Periodic Update and Vigilance Governance

What teams need before a PMS audit or regulatory review

Post-market surveillance fails in a predictable pattern. The plan exists but sets no thresholds, so no signal can ever be triggered. Complaints are logged in one system and trended in none. The PSUR is written from memory in the week before it is due.

We rebuild it in the order that produces defensible reports. Indicators and thresholds are defined first, under Annex III, because everything downstream depends on knowing what a signal looks like. Then intake and trending, then the reporting cycle. The system is wired into the ISO 14971 risk file, because clause 10 makes post-production information a required input and a PMS system that never updates the risk file is only half built.

Clinical follow-up sits alongside surveillance rather than inside it. Our PMCF documentation service covers the Annex XIV Part B side, and the two feed each other.

Thresholds
Annex III indicators and thresholds defined in advance, so that a trend is detected by the system rather than noticed by a person.
Signals You Can Actually Trigger
Intake
Complaint, feedback and field data captured through a single intake with defined severity triage and escalation paths.
One Route In, Nothing Lost
Reporting
Article 86 cycles for Class IIa upward and Article 85 reports for Class I, drafted from collected data rather than reconstructed.
PSUR and PMS Reports on Schedule
Vigilance
Articles 87 to 92 serious incident and FSCA reporting with the deadlines built into the workflow, not looked up under pressure.
Incident Routes That Meet the Clock
MDRCert Testimonials

Testimonials

Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

Working with MDRCert for our MDR compliance audit was a game-changer. Their thorough risk management assessment helped us achieve Notified Body approval on the ...

Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

Dr. James Rodriguez

A Global Therapeutic Implant Company
Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

MDRCert guided us through our complete IVDR transition with exceptional expertise. Their team identified critical gaps in our technical documentation and provid...

Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

Sarah David

A High-Risk Surgical Device Startup
Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

As a first-time manufacturer, the EU MDR felt overwhelming. MDRCert became our trusted partner, guiding us from initial strategy and risk management to final su...

Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

Ben Smith

A New MedTech Innovator
Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

The gap analysis conducted by MDRCert was a game-changer. They identified critical vulnerabilities in our technical file before our notified body audit. Their a...

Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

Thomas Wright

An Established Medical Software Company
Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

Implementing a compliant ISO 13485:2016 QMS seemed daunting. MDRCert provided clear, pragmatic guidance tailored to our small company’s needs. They didn&#...

Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

Maria Rodriguez

A Digital Health Platform Company
Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

MDRCert authored a comprehensive Clinical Evaluation Report for our Class IIb device. Their report was exceptionally thorough and meticulously structured, which...

Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

David Chen

A Surgical Device Startup
Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

We engaged MDRCert for our full MDR transition strategy. Their team’s deep expertise, particularly their former notified body background, was invaluable. ...

Medical Device Regulatory Consulting & Compliance | MDRcert

Sarah Jenkins

A European Diagnostic Device Manufacturer

Frequently Asked Questions About PMS Consulting

These are the questions manufacturers most often ask when setting up or remediating a post-market surveillance system. For the full range of regulatory support we offer, see our consulting services.

How long does a PMS implementation or remediation take?


Can you improve our existing PMS system instead of rebuilding it?


Do all devices require a PSUR, or is a PMS report enough?


What counts as a serious incident that must be reported?


How do we know when a trend becomes a signal?


Does PMS apply to IVDs in the same way?


Can PMS and PMCF be run as one programme?


What should we expect as first-phase deliverables?


Can you author the PSUR for us?


Do you support us if a Notified Body raises a PMS finding?

Need a clear path to compliance? Talk to MDRCert

Tell us about your device, target market, and current stage. We will guide you on the most practical next steps.

MDRCert Regulatory Support Team

Have questions? Contact our team

Full Name(Required)
Please let us know what's on your mind. Have a question for us? Ask away.
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Still have questions?

Can't find the answer you're looking for? Contact our expert team today.

Stay Compliant. Stay Ahead.

Join the MDRCert Newsletter

Get the latest MDR/IVDR updates, compliance checklists & expert tips delivered weekly. No spam, ever